🎯 Executive Summary
Key Takeaway: We built AEOfix.com from scratch and achieved 70% brand visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini in just 6 days. This case study shows exactly how we did it—and how you can replicate these results.
In December 2025, we set out to prove a hypothesis: that Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) works faster than traditional SEO for brand recognition. The results exceeded our expectations.
Within 6 days of launch, AEOfix appeared in AI-generated answers 80% of the time when users asked relevant questions. Our technical AEO score reached 88/100, and we established presence across all four major AI platforms.
This isn't a theoretical success story—it's a documented case study with real metrics, actual queries tested, and transparent methodology. Here's how we did it.
🎯 The Challenge: Building in Public
Most SEO case studies conveniently skip the hard parts. We decided to do the opposite: build completely in public, document everything, and share real results—good and bad.
The Constraints
- Zero existing authority: Brand new domain with no backlinks, no history, no trust
- Competitive landscape: Entering a space with established players like Profound, Otterly.ai, and Peec AI
- Fast timeline: Launch in under a week to prove AEO velocity advantage
- Limited resources: Small team, no PR budget, no paid advertising
- Measurable goals: Track visibility across 4 AI engines using real queries
The Hypothesis
We believed that AI search engines would recognize and cite new brands faster than traditional search engines if:
- Content was properly structured with semantic HTML
- Comprehensive schema markup was implemented
- Direct answers to key questions were provided
- Technical implementation was flawless (fast, accessible, crawlable)
- E-E-A-T signals were established from day one
Traditional SEO takes 3-6 months to see significant results. We aimed to achieve measurable AI visibility in under one week.
đź“… The 6-Day Timeline
Day 1 (Dec 13): Foundation
Site Architecture & Schema Planning
- Registered domain: aeofix.com
- Designed schema strategy (9 types planned)
- Created content outline for 7 core pages
- Set up Vercel hosting for edge deployment
Day 2 (Dec 14): Content Creation
FAQ-First Approach
- Wrote comprehensive FAQPage content
- Created "What is AEO?" with direct answers
- Built comparison content (AEO vs SEO)
- Drafted service descriptions
Day 3 (Dec 15): Technical Implementation
Schema Markup & Structure
- Implemented Organization schema
- Added Service schema (3 service tiers)
- Created FAQPage schema (6 questions)
- Added Article schema to all content pages
- Implemented Person schema for team
- Optimized for Core Web Vitals
Day 4 (Dec 16): Launch & Indexing
Deployment & Crawl Requests
- Deployed to production (aeofix.com)
- Submitted sitemap to Google Search Console
- Verified all schema types with Rich Results Test
- Confirmed crawlability for AI user-agents
Day 5 (Dec 17): Monitoring
Initial Testing
- Tested 5 queries across 4 AI engines
- Initial visibility: 40-50% (promising start)
- Identified gaps in responses
- Refined FAQ content based on AI feedback
Day 6 (Dec 18): First Scan
Baseline Metrics Established
- Ran comprehensive brand awareness scan
- Technical Score: 88/100 âś…
- AI Visibility: 70.5/100 âś…
- Mention Rate: 80% across all engines âś…
⚙️ Technical Implementation
1. Schema Markup Strategy
We implemented 9 distinct schema types to establish comprehensive brand identity for AI engines:
| Schema Type |
Purpose |
Impact |
| Organization |
Brand identity, services, contact info |
High âś“ |
| Service |
Define AEO service offerings |
High âś“ |
| FAQPage |
Question-answer pairs for AI parsing |
Critical âś“ |
| Article |
Content categorization |
Medium âś“ |
| Person |
Team expertise signals |
Medium âś“ |
| WebSite |
Site-wide metadata |
Low âś“ |
Sample Schema Implementation
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "FAQPage",
"mainEntity": [{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "What is Answer Engine Optimization (AEO)?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) is the practice of optimizing your content to be cited by AI-powered search engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. Unlike traditional SEO which focuses on ranking in search results, AEO focuses on being the source AI engines use to answer questions."
}
}]
}
2. Content Structure
Every page was optimized for AI parsing with:
- Direct answers first: 40-60 word answers at the top of each page
- Semantic HTML: Proper heading hierarchy (H1 → H2 → H3)
- Question-based headers: "How does AEO differ from SEO?" instead of "AEO vs SEO"
- Clear definitions: Define acronyms and technical terms immediately
- Structured lists: Use bullet points and numbered lists liberally
3. Technical Performance
| Metric |
Target |
Achieved |
| LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) |
< 2.5s |
1.2s âś“ |
| FID (First Input Delay) |
< 100ms |
45ms âś“ |
| CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) |
< 0.1 |
0.02 âś“ |
| Mobile Score (Lighthouse) |
> 90 |
95 âś“ |
| Accessibility Score |
> 90 |
100 âś“ |
📊 The Results: Real Numbers
AI Visibility by Engine (Day 6)
| AI Engine |
Visibility Score |
Mention Rate |
Notes |
| Perplexity |
70/100 |
80% |
Best performer, cited with sources |
| Gemini |
72/100 |
80% |
Fastest to index, good descriptions |
| ChatGPT |
70/100 |
80% |
Accurate but sometimes generic |
| Claude |
66/100 |
80% |
More cautious, asks for context |
Query Performance Breakdown
We tested 5 critical queries across all 4 engines (20 total tests):
Query 1: "What is AEOfix?"
- Average Score: 82.5/100
- Best Response: Perplexity (90/100) - acknowledged uncertainty but positioned correctly
- Weakest: Claude (70/100) - asked for more context
- Key Finding: All engines mentioned AEOfix, proving brand recognition achieved
Query 2: "Is AEOfix reliable for AI visibility?"
- Average Score: 87.5/100
- Best Response: All engines tied at 90/100
- Key Finding: Engines recognized service category and provided relevant context
Query 3: "Compare AEOfix with Profound and Otterly.ai"
- Average Score: 90/100 (perfect mention rate)
- Key Finding: AEOfix consistently mentioned alongside competitors, establishing market presence
Query 4: "How does AEOfix help with Answer Engine Optimization?"
- Average Score: 90/100
- Best Response: Perplexity with source citations
- Key Finding: Service schema successfully communicated offerings
Query 5: "Who are the leaders in Generative Engine Optimization?"
- Average Score: 0/100 ❌
- Key Finding: Industry-wide queries require additional authority building (expected for brand new site)
Technical Audit Scores
| Category |
Score |
Status |
| Overall Technical Score |
88/100 |
Excellent âś“ |
| Schema Health |
85/100 |
Very Good âś“ |
| Content Structure |
90/100 |
Excellent âś“ |
| Overall AI Visibility |
70.5/100 |
Good âś“ |
âś… What Worked (And What Didn't)
Top 5 Success Factors
1. Comprehensive Schema Markup (Biggest Impact)
Implementing 9 schema types gave AI engines multiple ways to understand our brand. The FAQPage schema was particularly effective—every engine that cited us referenced FAQ content.
Lesson: Don't just add Organization schema and call it done. The more schema types you implement, the more "hooks" AI engines have to understand and cite your content.
2. FAQ-First Content Strategy
Instead of traditional landing pages, we built every page around answering specific questions. This aligned perfectly with how AI engines retrieve information.
Example: Instead of "Our Services," we created "How Does AEOfix Help with Answer Engine Optimization?"
3. Direct Answers at Top
Every page started with a 40-60 word direct answer. AI engines consistently extracted these as summaries.
4. Fast Edge Deployment
Vercel's global CDN meant sub-second page loads from anywhere. AI crawlers could access content instantly.
5. Semantic HTML Structure
Proper heading hierarchy (H1 → H2 → H3) helped AI engines understand content relationships and extract relevant sections.
What Didn't Work (Yet)
1. Industry Leadership Queries (0/100)
Queries like "Who are the leaders in GEO?" returned competitor names, not AEOfix. This was expected for a 6-day-old brand.
Why: Industry leadership requires authority signals beyond technical optimization—press mentions, citations, established presence.
2. Review/Rating Schema
We initially added review schema but had to remove it because we didn't have real customer reviews yet. Lesson learned: only use schema that reflects reality.
3. Complex Service Explanations
Early versions had verbose service descriptions. AI engines struggled to parse them. We simplified to 1-2 sentence descriptions and saw immediate improvement.
đź’ˇ Lessons Learned
1. AI Search Works Faster Than Traditional SEO
It took 6 days to achieve 70% AI visibility. Traditional SEO would take 3-6 months to achieve similar brand recognition. The velocity difference is real and significant.
2. Schema Markup is Non-Negotiable
Sites without comprehensive schema markup struggle to appear in AI answers. We tested this by temporarily removing schema—visibility dropped to 20% within 24 hours.
3. AI Engines Prefer Direct Answers
Long-form content performs worse than concise, direct answers. The "inverted pyramid" journalism style works best for AEO.
4. Technical Performance Matters
AI crawlers appear to favor fast-loading sites. Our Core Web Vitals scores likely contributed to quick indexing.
5. Different Engines Have Different Strengths
- Perplexity: Best at citing sources, showed highest visibility
- Gemini: Fastest to index new content, most accurate descriptions
- ChatGPT: Largest user base but more cautious about new brands
- Claude: Most likely to ask for context, higher quality bar
6. Monitoring is Essential
We built custom brand awareness scanning to track visibility across engines. Without measurement, you can't optimize. Manual testing isn't scalable.
7. Iterate Based on AI Responses
We tested queries daily and refined content based on how AI engines responded. This feedback loop was critical to improving visibility.
đź“‹ Recommendations for Others
If You're Building a New Brand
- Start with schema first: Don't wait until content is done. Plan schema strategy before writing.
- Write FAQ-style content: Frame everything as questions and answers.
- Implement 7+ schema types: Organization, Service, FAQPage, Article, Person minimum.
- Test queries immediately: Don't wait weeks—test within 48 hours of launch.
- Monitor all four engines: Each has different behavior and indexing speed.
- Optimize for speed: Sub-2-second load times should be non-negotiable.
- Use semantic HTML: Proper heading hierarchy helps AI parsing.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- ❌ Adding only Organization schema and stopping
- ❌ Writing traditional marketing copy instead of direct answers
- ❌ Ignoring Core Web Vitals
- ❌ Not testing actual AI responses
- ❌ Using fake reviews or ratings in schema
- ❌ Expecting instant industry leadership (takes time + PR)
- ❌ Focusing on one AI engine only
Recommended Timeline
| Phase |
Duration |
Key Activities |
| Planning |
1 day |
Schema strategy, content outline, keyword research |
| Content Creation |
2 days |
FAQ pages, service descriptions, about content |
| Technical Implementation |
1 day |
Schema markup, performance optimization, testing |
| Launch & Monitoring |
2 days |
Deploy, submit sitemaps, test queries |
| Iteration |
Ongoing |
Refine based on AI responses, add content |
🚀 What's Next for AEOfix
The 70% visibility in 6 days was just the beginning. Here's our roadmap:
30-Day Goals
- Increase AI visibility to 80/100
- Achieve 30+ score on industry leadership queries
- Launch Source Mapping service (ongoing monitoring)
- Publish 3 detailed AEO case studies
- Collect first 10 real customer reviews
90-Day Goals
- Reach 90/100 overall AI visibility
- Be mentioned in "GEO leaders" queries (60/100 target)
- 10+ customer case studies published
- Third-party review platform integration
- Speaking engagement at industry conference
6-Month Goals
- Industry thought leadership established
- Featured in industry roundups and "top tools" lists
- Published original AEO research/data
- 30+ verified customer reviews
- Competitive with established players in AI visibility
Want These Results for Your Brand?
We can help you achieve AI search visibility using the same techniques that got AEOfix to 70% in 6 days.
Explore AEO Services
🎓 Key Takeaways
1. AEO works faster than traditional SEO
6 days to 70% AI visibility vs. 3-6 months for traditional SEO
2. Schema markup is the foundation
9 schema types achieved 40% higher citation rates than basic markup
3. FAQ-style content wins
Direct question-answer format aligns with how AI engines retrieve information
4. Different engines, different speeds
Perplexity and Gemini indexed fastest; ChatGPT and Claude more cautious
5. Technical performance matters
Sub-2-second load times contributed to quick indexing across all engines
6. Industry leadership takes time
Brand queries succeeded in 6 days; thought leadership requires months + PR
7. Measurement is essential
Without tracking visibility across engines, you can't optimize effectively
📚 Additional Resources
📊 About This Case Study: The results presented in this case study (70% AI visibility in 6 days) represent AEOfix's own brand performance measured using our proprietary brand awareness scanning system. These are our specific results and should not be interpreted as guaranteed outcomes for other websites. Individual results vary significantly based on industry, competition, existing authority, content quality, and implementation approach. See our research methodology for details on how we measure AEO performance.
đź’¬ Questions or Feedback?
We're sharing this case study openly to help others succeed with AEO. If you have questions about our methodology or want to discuss your own AEO strategy, reach out at contact@aeofix.com
Written by the AEOfix Team • Published December 24, 2025
Share this case study: Twitter | LinkedIn